3 thoughts on “New Scientist gets it right.

  1. Too bad it’s behind a pay wall (so, ultimately, they’re getting something wrong). Worse yet, the part that’s open to non-subscribers paints a picture that leads the reader to believe that all junk dna has a function. I’m guessing that it’s just the set up for a twist (judging by your positive reaction to the article), but I’d have no way of knowing that because I don’t have access.

  2. Hmmph, I only just got my June 30th issue yesterday. It can’t possibly take that much longer to reach the West coast?

Comments are closed.