Comments on: Non-functional DNA: the burden of proof. http://www.genomicron.evolverzone.com/2008/02/non-functional-dna-burden-of-proof/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:46:45 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Larry Moran http://www.genomicron.evolverzone.com/2008/02/non-functional-dna-burden-of-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-687 Larry Moran Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:30:00 +0000 http://www.genomicron.evolverzone.com/2008/02/non-functional-dna-the-burden-of-proof/#comment-687 Thank-you for saying that.<br/><br/>It is widely believed that we know nothing at all about genomes and we're only saying much of it is non-functional because we are ignorant.<br/><br/>That's far from the truth as you know. <br/><br/>Isn't it sad that there are supposedly competent scientists who publish papers revealing their ignorance of 35 years of work? The burden of proof is on them to refute or discredit the data pointing to lack of function. They can't do that if they haven't done their homework. Thank-you for saying that.

It is widely believed that we know nothing at all about genomes and we’re only saying much of it is non-functional because we are ignorant.

That’s far from the truth as you know.

Isn’t it sad that there are supposedly competent scientists who publish papers revealing their ignorance of 35 years of work? The burden of proof is on them to refute or discredit the data pointing to lack of function. They can’t do that if they haven’t done their homework.

]]>