i’m pretty sure that an effective foil hat has FIVE antennae, and any scientist would scoff at one with only three. talk about misrepresenting science.
I think they missed the arrow where the scientist himself/herself talks to "Scientific American"/"New Scientist" and claims that the very minor discovery that A correlates with B is revolutionary accomplishment that overturns the work of Darwin/Einstein/Watson & Crick.
Indeed Badger, there is a tendency among science bloggers to grant their colleagues more slack.
i’m pretty sure that an effective foil hat has FIVE antennae, and any scientist would scoff at one with only three. talk about misrepresenting science.
I think they missed the arrow where the scientist himself/herself talks to "Scientific American"/"New Scientist" and claims that the very minor discovery that A correlates with B is revolutionary accomplishment that overturns the work of Darwin/Einstein/Watson & Crick.
Indeed Badger, there is a tendency among science bloggers to grant their colleagues more slack.