I’ll just let this soup sandwich of an abstract speak for itself:
We find that the global relationships among species should be of circular phylogeny, which is quite different from common sense based on phylogenetic trees. A domain can be defined by a distinct phylogenetic circle, which is a global and stable characteristic of the living system. The mechanism in genome size evolution has been clarified; hence the main component questions on C-value enigma can be explained. We find the intrinsic relationship between genome size evolution and protein length evolution; that is the genome size and non-coding DNA ratio can be calculated based on protein length distributions.
(These are the same authors who brought us this turd gem).
Please tell me that was not some sort of review of a grant or paper you submitted. It sounds like the content of papers auto-generated on various joke websites. Sounds superficially like science until your brain clicks in…
Beth(Quote)
Unrelated, but have you seen the ENCODE 2012 critique that is online at Genome Biology and Evolution?
http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/02/20/gbe.evt028.short?rss=1
TheOtherJim(Quote)