Well, the Microbial Art collection has become far more popular than I ever expected. It passed 20,000 unique visits today, after about 2 months online. This was helped by the recent features on New Scientist, Wired Italy, and Wired UK, and a viral outbreak of re-posts of the bacterial Mario image, which has [...]
As I mentioned in my previous post, my students and I have been experimenting with creating art from living colonies of bacteria:
I don’t think this is a common art form (though it’s one I want to explore in more detail down the road), but I am aware of a few other very intriguing examples of [...]
About me
T. Ryan Gregory
I am an evolutionary biologist specializing in genome size evolution at the University of Guelph in Canada.
Where was I? 4-1.: It’s that time again! Where was I? Enter your guess under Other below, and I will reveal the... http://bit.ly/dyxhVq - posted on 17/03/2010 09:59:44
My other projects…
Evolver Gear
Discover a wide diversity of Evolver Gear at the EZ Store.
Current readers
Notable Quotables
There are two major reasons that scientists accept common descent as fact. The first is that it is supported by, and accounts for, a multitude of independent observations, including data from genetics, developmental biology, the fossil record, comparative anatomy, and the geographical distribution of species. The second is that not a single observation or inference made over the past 150 years has provided convincing evidence that modern species are not descended from common ancestors. The notion of common descent has even withstood the rise of entirely new scientific disciplines, including molecular genetics and, most recently, comparisons of entire genomes. — T. Ryan Gregory, Darwin’s two-for-one deal