Not a good title (I know, probably not decided by the author), but overall a good piece on selection at multiple levels.
The selfless gene: Rethinking Dawkins’s doctrine
Selection at several levels (New Scientist).Not a good title (I know, probably not decided by the author), but overall a good piece on selection at multiple levels. The selfless gene: Rethinking Dawkins’s doctrine Related posts1 comment to Selection at several levels (New Scientist). |
|
|
© 2012 T. Ryan Gregory | |
|
Ugh. That title is miserable at several levels. (Maybe they got a physicist to write it.) Why is the gene-centred view of evolution a “doctrine”? Why ascribe it to Dawkins, instead of Hamilton, Williams, Fisher? And if we’re moving beyond the gene-centred view, why does the headline focus on genes, anyway?
Fittingly enough, the knowledge of the headline writer seems restricted to book titles.
Blake Stacey(Quote)