Sadly, I can’t read Danish and therefore I am not sure quite what this article in Ingeniøren actually says.
Evolutionsteorien er under stadig udvikling
However, I can say that the author, Robin Engelhardt, was not only pleasant but he absolutely had done his homework and grasped the issue (whether the rise of epigenetics constitutes neo-Lamarckism) quite well. I wish more science writers would take this example!
I ran the article through Google Translator. It's not perfect, but it's readable.
http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&hl=en&js=n&u=http%3A%2F%2Fing.dk%2Fartikel%2F97896-evolutionsteorien-er-under-stadig-udvikling&sl=da&tl=en
Full translated title to give you some idea on what it's like:
"Evolution theory is constantly evolving
The great attention epigenetik evolution theory has provided great-grandfather, Jean Baptiste Lamarck, new wind in our sails. Neo-lamarckisme kaldes det, men epigenetisk arvelighed passer bedre til Darwins ideer end til Larmarcks. Neo-lamarckisme known, but epigenetic inheritance is more suited to Darwins ideas than Larmarcks."
Wow. You praise a writer whose work you haven’t even read. Again, wow. Makes one wonder how many other people/things/ideas you praise or, more often than not, criticize, that you have not really read. You are a walking, I mean blogging, hypocrite.
I didn’t praise his writing, I said he had clearly done his homework — this is a conclusion based on email and a phone interview.