i’m pretty sure that an effective foil hat has FIVE antennae, and any scientist would scoff at one with only three. talk about misrepresenting science.
I think they missed the arrow where the scientist himself/herself talks to "Scientific American"/"New Scientist" and claims that the very minor discovery that A correlates with B is revolutionary accomplishment that overturns the work of Darwin/Einstein/Watson & Crick.
Indeed Badger, there is a tendency among science bloggers to grant their colleagues more slack.
Comments are closed.